CONSOLIDATED MEDICAL BILLING

-

Of course certain surgeries routinely require anesthesia. Many critical diagnostic procedures such as X-rays and CT scans are part of routine medical procedures. Why is it then, that these are billed separately as if you would willingly opt out of them, as if you can shop around for them separately? Why are these particular attendant services treated separately (and not others), like nursing services or the services of the primary doctor?

The answers given have more to do with the arbitrary territorial boundaries that providers of these services have carved out for themselves over the years. But when a patient seeks a medical service for a chief complaint, these services are coordinated by a receiving hospital or provider, who then assembles these services with zero patient input. That receiving hospital or provider can (and should) also coordinate billing.

Let’s say you are admitted for a routine medical procedure – and by “routine” I mean an uncomplicated procedure that is done millions of times a year, maybe even several times a day by the hospital or provider you are seeing - you then receive a bill weeks (or months) later for that service. Let’s say it is a laparoscopic appendectomy. You get a bill from the hospital. It is a big bill. And because you do not have Medicare for All, you pay that big bill (maybe budgeting for it), and if you are like most Americans you plan and scrimp where you can to make ends meet. And then – surprise! - you get another bill and another and yet another. It’s all a mystery; it’s all a surprise. It’s all unnecessary.

It can all be consolidated into one bill. And it should happen this way.

These instances are not the biggest problem in our health care system in the US, but these problems certainly ARE among the ones which can be easily solved by an act of the Maine Legislature. And it would be one less headache, one less source of stress, and this alone could be of benefit to your health.

See Eben Rose Webpage: https://www.ebenrose.com/
FACEBOOK: User must login
https://www.facebook.com/EbenRoseforMaineSenate/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

DECARBONIZATION SAVINGS BANK

-
The Decarbonization Savings Bank rewards all Maine residents for investing in the development of “green” infrastructure that will replace the fossil fuel-dependent infrastructure on which our inherited economy depends. A basic bank function is to gather small deposits and issue mortgages, i.e., large loans. Key aspects of this bank are: Deposits A guaranteed 3% return for small deposits of $1 to $50,000. Interest  earned above $50,000 are returned as a dividend. Simplicity. Transactions are limited to straightforward deposits and  withdrawals. Focus is on savings. Your money is always available to you. Deposits are  made with one-click simplicity. Transfers can be made as direct deposits  to  commercial banks or on-line payment systems, and withdrawals can  be made  as debits within the State. Low overhead and administrative cost. Simplicity allows most bank functions  to be fully automated. This in turn allows margins between interest paid to depositors and interest charged to
Read more

SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY

-
The first modification of the Constitution after it was adopted, emerged to remedy a concern over the vulnerability of States to private and foreign lawsuits that would essentially, nullify their authority to make laws at all. The 11th Amendment extends the right of sovereign immunity to States. States can waive this immunity, and sometimes they do. But courts have long upheld sovereign immunity (as long as it does not interfere with the 14th Amendment’s abolition of slavery). Sovereign immunity is a handy tool in the tool chest that can be used in defense of environmental laws. Clean air, clean water, and preservation of nature are, after all, sovereign interests within a state’s borders. They can can and should be spelled out as such. That relates to States though, not local governments. Local efforts to create a more democratic and sustainable world through environmental laws will inevitably receive opposition not only in enacting them, but also afterwards in lawsuits brought by we
Read more